July 2016 Newsletter

Using “dominance” to explain dog behaviour is old hat

I get called out to so many jobs where the owners have been told, incorrectly, that their dog is “dominant and trying to be the leader” – so lets get some facts straight, this article is excellent, although originally done in 2009, the pet dog owning public never get to read such things as “facts”, they only get told the “fiction dressed up as fact!”

A new study shows how the behaviour of dogs has been misunderstood for generations: in fact using misplaced ideas about dog behaviour and training is likely to cause rather than cure unwanted behaviour.  The findings challenge many of the dominance related interpretations of behaviour and training techniques suggested by some TV dog trainers.Contrary to popular belief, aggressive dogs are NOT trying to assert their dominance over their canine or human “pack”, according to research published by academics at the University of Bristol’sDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Sciences in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research.

The researchers spent six months studying dogs freely interacting at a Dogs Trust rehoming centre, and reanalysing data from studies of feral dogs, before concluding that individual relationships between dogs are learnt through experience rather than motivated by a desire to assert “dominance”.

The paper “Dominance in domestic dogs – useful construct or bad habit?” reveals that dogs are not motivated by maintaining their place in the pecking order of their pack, as many well-known dog trainers preach.

Far from being helpful, the academics say, training approaches aimed at “dominance reduction” vary from being worthless in treatment to being actually dangerous and likely to make behaviours worse.

Instructing owners to eat before their dog or go through doors first will not influence the dog’s overall perception of the relationship – merely teach them what to expect in these specific situations.  Much worse, techniques such as pinning the dog to the floor, grabbing jowls, or blasting hooters at dogs will make dogs anxious, often about their owner, and potentially lead to an escalation of aggression.

Dr Rachel Casey, Senior Lecturer in Companion Animal Behaviour and Welfare at Bristol University, said:  “The blanket assumption that every dog is motivated by some innate desire to control people and other dogs is frankly ridiculous.  It hugely underestimates the complex communicative and learning abilities of dogs. It also leads to the use of coercive training techniques, which compromise welfare, and actually cause problem behaviours.

“In our referral clinic we very often see dogs which have learnt to show aggression to avoid anticipated punishment. Owners are often horrified when we explain that their dog is terrified of them, and is showing aggression because of the techniques they have used – but its not their fault when they have been advised to do so, for example by unqualified ‘behaviourists’ recommending such techniques.”

At Dogs Trust, the UK’s largest dog welfare charity, rehoming centre staff see the results of misguided dog training all the time.  Veterinary Director Chris Laurence MBE, added: “We can tell when a dog comes in to us which has been subjected to the ‘dominance reduction technique’ so beloved of TV dog trainers.  They can be very fearful, which can lead to aggression towards people.

“Sadly, many techniques used to teach a dog that his owner is leader of the pack is counter-productive; you won’t get a better behaved dog, but you will either end up with a dog so fearful it has suppressed all its natural behaviours and will just do nothing, or one so aggressive it’s dangerous to be around.”

Further information

The paper: ‘Dominance in domestic dogs – useful construct or bad habit? by John W. S. Bradshaw, Emily J. Blackwell, Rachel A. Casey. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 109-144 (May-June 2009). The academics would like to thank Claire Cooke and Nicola Robertson for permission to describe their study of freely interacting dogs, Dogs Trust for providing access to a group of dogs. Support for academic posts from the Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, RSPCA and Cats Protection is also acknowledged.

Please contact Joanne Fryer for further information.

Emotions In dogs

Dogs can be optimistic or pessimistic

A study  providing an important insight into dogs’ emotions suggests that at least some dogs who show separation-related behaviour may have underlying negative emotional states.

Just like us, dogs can tend to be optimistic or pessimistic. Many dogs become distressed when left home alone, and they show it by barking, destroying things, or toileting indoors. A study gained new insight into the minds of dogs by discovering that those who are anxious when left alone also tend to show ‘pessimistic’ like behaviour.

Professor Mike Mendl, Head of the Animal Welfare and Behaviour research group at the UK’s Bristol University, who led the research, said: “We all have a tendency to think that our pets and other animals experience emotions similar to our own, but we have no way of knowing directly because emotions are essentially private”. However, his research team was able to develop a new method to study ‘pessimistic’ or ‘optimistic’ decisions in dogs.

He added: “We know that people’s emotional states affect their judgments; happy people are more likely to judge an ambiguous situation positively. Now it seems that this may also apply to dogs; dogs that behaved anxiously when left alone also tended to judge ambiguous events negatively. Their anxious behaviour may reflect an underlying negative emotional state.”

The researchers conducted the study with 24 dogs that had recently entered a re-homing shelter in the UK. Each dog was first tested for separation anxiety-related behaviours. A researcher interacted with each dog in an isolated room for 20 minutes. The following day, they took the dog back to the room and then left it alone for a period of five minutes while its behaviour was captured on video. In those five minutes, the researchers observed barking, jumping on furniture, scratching at the door, and repetitive behaviours to varying extents depending on the dog.

In order to study decision-making in those same dogs, the researchers trained them to expect that when a bowl was placed at one location in a room (the ‘positive’ position), it would contain food, but when placed at another location (the ‘negative’ position), it would be empty. They then placed the bowl in ambiguous locations in between the positive and negative positions. Dogs that ran quickly to those ambiguous locations, as if expecting the positive food reward, were classed as making relatively ‘optimistic’ decisions. Dogs that didn’t approach the bowl as if they were expecting a food reward were judged to be ‘pessimistic.’

The dogs that made more ‘pessimistic’ judgments about whether they would find a food bowl empty or full also expressed more separation-related behaviours.

Mendl said: “We know that people’s emotional states affect their judgements and that happy people are more likely to judge an ambiguous situation positively. What our study has shown is that this applies similarly to dogs – that a ‘glass-half-full’ dog is less likely to be anxious when left alone than one with a more ‘pessimistic’ nature.”

The results suggest that behaviour regarded as ‘problematic’ for owners also has emotional significance for the animals concerned, even when the behaviour itself isn’t being expressed, the researchers concluded. Mendl says the results also suggest that ‘optimistic’ versus ‘pessimistic’ decision-making may be a valuable new indicator of animal emotion.

The findings also raise the possibility that some dogs may be more prone to responding anxiously when left alone than others, and that this is related to their general mood. That’s important because “separation-related behaviour is common in dogs, so predicting which dogs may develop this, and treating them appropriately, is very important for ensuring good dog welfare.” Mendl said. People should be encouraged to seek treatment for these dogs to enhance their welfare rather than give them up for re-homing.

Dogs get depressed

Other studies have suggested that dogs can experience negative emotions in a similar manner to people, including the equivalent of certain chronic and acute psychological conditions  such as depression.

In 1965 Martin Seligman from the University of Pennsylvania conducted highly unethical experiments into a condition known as ‘learned helplessness’, as an extension of his interest in depression. The distressing experiments involved giving dogs electric shocks and showed that when dogs learned that nothing they could do could stop the shocks, they effectively gave up trying to escape and suffered chronic symptoms of clinical depression as a result of this perceived helplessness.

A further series of experiments showed that, similar to humans, under conditions of long term intense psychological stress, around a third of dogs do not develop learned helplessness or long term depression. Instead these animals somehow managed to find a way to handle the unpleasant situation in spite of their past experience. The same characteristic in humans has been linked with an optimistic attitude.

In more recent years, symptoms analogous to clinical depression, neurosis and other psychological conditions have been in general accepted as being within the scope of canine emotion.

Dogs can be jealous

Scientists in Austria found that dogs are capable of feeling jealous . They showed that dogs will stop doing a simple task when not rewarded if another dog, which continues to be rewarded, is present.

The experiment consisted of taking pairs of dogs and getting them to present a paw for a reward. On giving this ‘handshake’ the dogs received a piece of food.  One of the dogs was then asked to shake hands, but received no food. The other dog continued to get the food when it was asked to perform the task. The dog without the reward quickly stopped doing the task, and showed signs of annoyance or stress when its partner was rewarded.

“Dogs show a strong aversion to inequity. I would prefer not to call it a sense of fairness, but others might.” said Dr. Range who conducted the study.

This kind of behaviour, where one animal gets frustrated with what is happening with another, has only been observed in primates before. Studies with various types of monkeys and chimpanzees show they react not only to seeing their partners receiving rewards when they are not, but also to the type of reward.

The researchers say the type of behaviour exhibited in the experiment is probably due to the dog’s close association with humans. Dr Range says other animals need to be studied to really show how animals naturally exhibit jealousies or cooperate: “I’m sure that it’s not something that evolved with the dogs, we will have to test it in wolves and other cooperating species.”

Dogs can empathise with people

Researchers believe that dogs show empathy.

Empathy is feeling what others feel. Empathy is the ability to not only detect what others feel but also to experience that emotion yourself.

Dogs’ barks show their feelings

Dr. Peter Pongracz from Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, and colleagues have produced evidence that dog barks contain information that people can understand.

Their research suggests that even people who have never owned a dog can recognise the emotional ‘meaning’ of barks produced in various situations, such as when playing, left alone and confronted by a stranger .

They found that people can correctly identify aggregated barks as conveying happiness, loneliness or aggression. Pongracz said even children from the age of six who have never had a dog recognize these patterns. This is evidence that barking conveys information about a dog’s mental state.

The researchers developed a computer program that can aggregates hundreds of barks recorded in various settings and boils them down to their basic acoustic ingredients . Each of the different types of bark has distinct patterns of frequency, tonality and pulsing, and an artificial neural network can use these features to correctly identify a bark it has never encountered before, the researchers said.

Do you have any comments or feelings about this article?


Post a Reply